umm no, it had nothing to do with the age of germany's players. England had a referee decision go against them and completely fell apart after that. Germany quite simply had a much better team that played much better.
A team doesn't always win. Should they lose once, that doesn't consider them worse, especially when only 1 game determines it. Brazil is a superior team overall. Look at both team's records.
That is why you didn't know that Brazil is the better team. For most of that match, they dominated. Imagine if Melo wasn't red carded? If the keeper didn't make the rare mistake? Ask me why Holland couldn't add their lead to 2-3 goals? Instead, the only led by 1 goal.
I don't see the excitement in people kicking balls around a green field, trying to destroy an inanimate goal post. I guess I'm just not the type to like football,
You're not they only one, but I'm definitely watching the Wk. And that's like the only thing. I do hope you;re watching?
Back to the original point, Germany may be tactically the best side but I don't believe that the Dutch will fall for counter attack football and will go on to lift the trophy.
Its a part of british culture. Check out some films: green street football factory I.D. rise of the foot soldier cass Also, i cant see past germany if they keep playing as they have been.
ooh! the netherlands vs spain. Interessting. If Holland wants to win, they must do their very best...
But with all honesty, i really am glad that Netherlands and Spain are competing in the Finals. Its a good match. A former part of Spain is now again fighting the Spaniards.
Holland. But they kept on winning(no lost yet in world cup) that i really fear that they're too confident to win against spain.
