war, is it necessary??

have as much children as they want? people know how difficult it is to raise even atleas 6 children so people might agree to limit their family as they know it is for their own good

 

People won't necessarily want something until it's taken away. Making something illegal makes people want it more. The forbidden fruit always seems so much sweeter.

 

but would you want to give birth to more children when you know they will only suffer because you have so many children, would you wan't to give your child a life of poverty?

 

Personally, no. But there are people who want to have a large number of children who work hard to support them. Plus what would happen if you were to have two children then hace quintuplets(that's five babies)? The governmental policy above would want four put to death, but the mother would want to keep them all. How could the mother be expected to chose which to keep anyway?

 

then that would be an exeption but it rarely happens

 

So you're saying the law should only apply to those who want to follow it? ???

 

the law applies to all but to some exceptions like having the disabled and elderly rid in the bus first ;D

 

And you don't think you're going to end up with people saying "She has seven children, why can't I have four?!"

 

I support war. The reason why is because it acts like a population controller. Can you imagine how many people would be on this Earth now if there was no war at any point in Human history? I don't even want to think about it. I also want to be a fighter pilot and, no war = no pilot for me

 

i support war, only when the government tells the true purpose of going to war. and knowing politics, governments wont tell the truth

 

Its just as i said in the other thread. War=Population control. I wouldnt doubt that the government starts wars purposely for the sole fact of our overpopulation and to tell you the truth I really dont mind.

 

I agree on war but when it comes to war. I want it old school. People will have swords and stuff. No guns and missiles.

 

Yeah battles back then were Epic! Melee weapons rock!

 

War = Population control is the most ignorant excuse I've ever heard. Millions of people are born a year, and millions of people died (let that be murder or natural death). the world evens itself out on population. We are at war currently because of oil, Bush can't get enough of it (and he's paranoid that terrorist will come back and bomb us I suppose). We need to get the hell out of there and let them go about their own business.

War is only necessary (like I've said before) if it's a defensive war, there's really never a necessary reason other than that.

 

i will never support war as with war many people will be killed.the reason are as follows
1)imagine after war someone you loved or respected was killed during war.we all know how it feels when someone that we loved or respected had died.it will never be a good experience at all even if human population has gone down and our Planet Earth will not have a risk of over-populating.
2)during war when the war has not end what will we experience.the fear and uneasyness we will be going through during war.even if we are not involved in war,when the enemy comes those who are not involved will still be killed or even tortured to death.
so in the end what is the use of being a Fighter Plane Pilot or a Tank Commander when you will have a risk of dying or seeing your friends and family being killed in war?after war,either when you win or lose,you will still hate the other country who had your family and friends killed and you will never have a good life until you forgive that country and forget everything,which is not possible,since what you lost is not a non-living thing that can be replaced but a living breathing family member or friend that can never be replaced.

 

it also means a more painful and gruesome death.
gruesome as in not guts flying everywhere but rather the process of dying is slow and you can feel it and struggling to live.

btw, on that quintuplet idea, it may be allowed [children not be killed] as the idea of having a limited amount of children is based on the idea that when you give birth you give to one child. in general, the possibility of someone having twins or higher is unlikely then compared to someone who would more then likely bare one child at one time.

if it was reverse, more likely that you have twins and such, then it would become a prenancy limit [the success of the prenancy]. but even that becomes a problem as you'll also have to consider the likelihood of rather you get more twins then triplets or quintuplets and so on.

look at fascism, it was given birth from war. with war, you are given a sacrifice. that sacrifice makes you see what is truly important to you that you once did not have any interest.

 

War is a strange game - the only winning move is not to play.

 

what ever happened to just talking out the problem, didn't they learn that when they were kids(people who start wars)

 

I think war is necessary to get your points across and to inspire great game

 

I don't think it's necessary, after all we're all humans not of any other race. If were fighting aliens that was a differnt thing . However people should wash out the mindset of war from their brains. But who will understand, as they say war is necesssary for peace... what crap!