war, is it necessary??

I realise that, but I'm talking before Poland was invaded, the allies kept giving Hitler more and more treaties every time he broke one and invaded a country. Poland was just the straw that broke the donkey's back

 

allied thought they could appease hitler so they just let him take any land he wants thinking he should be satisfied and then stop his invasion ................. and not many treaties were signed during WW2

 

TBH i think war is absolutely necessary in this time of over population. Something has to cut as down,I mean if its not us then nature will do it for us (anyone who knows of population curves knows this). But that takes time, war does it pretty much instantly and things need to be done now. Yeah so what thats not the nicest things to say but tis true.

 

Its a cruel way to decreas population but before we should result to war should't we dicipline ourselves. Soldiers die because we keep multiplying so in the future even a war could not affect the rapid growth of population

 

man is the most intelligent being on earth but here misunderstandings still happed but have you ever heared of animals declaring war? we should be ashamed

 

no but animals arent stupid enough to mass over populate themselves, and when they do nature sorts it out (once again the population curves). Nature doesnt sort our population out enough because we think that we are above nature and modify it as much as we can to keep ourselves alive.

 

the way we understand better than animals, the sense of responsibility

 

wow heart warming show

 

why did george get killed who the f*ck killed him

 

ok I change my defenition on intelligence

Intelligence is the power to change the world an make it a better place

 

ok back to topic

a war greatly decreases population but what good is it when we just keep on multiplying so in the end we just have to have dicipline and not resort to any violence such as wars

 

thats right there are other ways of keeping the population from exploding

 

like what?

 

for example we might require mother who have atleast 3 children to have an operation which will disable their potency of giving birth thus slowing the birthrate and having stable families and decreas families who suffer from poverty because they have 12 or more children to support

 

The only problem with that is that people would campaign for the right to choose to have as many children as they wanted. Unless it was a dictatorship, the government would probably yeild to their demands. If it was a dictatorship, then it'd probably lead to rebellion in most countries. Yay a war, everybody wins...