tongue twisters

bill bill chill pill mill ill feel bill mill why why when fa why kill pill mill why is bill ill pill mill billl ocean
say really really really fast

 

I wish we could do that here. >_>

 

BIT MY TONGUE damn

 

i did too bit my tongue.

 

Can't think of any english now!

 

Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.
A peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked.
If Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers,
Where's the peck of pickled peppers Peter Piper picked?

 

Some black beetles bleed black blood, while other black beetles bleed blue.




Unique New York.

 

Luke's duck likes lakes. Luke Luck licks lakes. Luke's duck licks lakes. Duck takes licks in lakes Luke Luck likes. Luke Luck takes licks in lakes duck likes.

Terry Teeter, a teeter-totter teacher, taught her daughter Tara to teeter-totter, but Tara Teeter didn't teeter-totter as Terry Teeter taught her to.

 

If Pickford's packers packed a packet of crisps would the packet of crisps that Pickford's packers packed survive for two and a half years?

 

Rick Roll Rick Rolled Himself by seeking Rick Rolling Rick Rolls

 

I thought a thought.
But the thought I thought wasn't the thought I thought I thought.
If the thought I thought I thought had been the thought I thought, I wouldn't have thought so much.

 

I AM THINKING!!!

 

When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?

Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.

Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.

Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?

Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right.

Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?

Wrongfully copying a right write, a right rite or copy is not right.

 

A noise annoys an oyster,
But a noisy noise annoys an oyster more.

 

I forgo pity for the foolishly foolish fools who fool with foolishly foolish foolhardy fool toys in the foolishly foolish thought that your foolishly foolish mind could foolishly fight to foolishly come into a faint existence of the foolishly foolish.

It twisted my tongue a little. AND I was trying to sound like Franziska von Karma. XD

 

How can a clam cram in a clean cream can?