1. This forum is in read-only mode.

The moon landing: ridiculous

Discussion in 'Debates' started by lampslammer, Jun 16, 2009.

  1. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    if your ears don't work it does.
     
  2. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    That would be a contributing factor...didn't think of that. :p
     
  3. Arcwolf09

    Arcwolf09 Guest

    The point is if it was faked who gives a shit any more. We know we can go there now so whats the point on dwelling on faked shit. we need to dwell on relevent stuff like finding a way to use negative energy to create worm holes to travel through space. Also to keep AI's Shackled so they wont destroy us.
     
  4. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    Why is it fake?

    Have you seen the Mythbusters of the Moon Landing?
    That proved a lot of speculation. Also, the mirrors on the moon that are used to measure its distance...how'd that get there?
     
  5. Arcwolf09

    Arcwolf09 Guest

    exactly. Proof of landing.
     
  6. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    Wait...are you for it?
     
  7. Xynche

    Xynche Well-Known Member

    I hate all the negative energy/mass stuff... Thereis absolutly ZERO proof of an of it, along with the string theory and all other theorys on black holes (including quantum physics which is a load of crap)

    I say people need to stop waisting there life on worthless theorys that aren't going to help us in the end anyway.

    Also... So if black holes suck in light... That means light weighs something... Which means it has mass... What is light made of?
     
  8. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    quantum physics is widely proven, and yes light is affected by gravity. Google 'wave/particle duality'. Light is made up of photons which exhibit properties of both waves and particles.
     
  9. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    Yeah. Have they found the equation that brings big mass and little mass together yet?
    I don't think they've found that yet.
    But, yes, there is substantial proof that quantum physics is real and all that jazz.
    I just don't want to delve in it. :p
     
  10. gaynorvader

    gaynorvader Well-Known Member

    Why would an AI want to destroy us?
     
  11. MR4Y

    MR4Y Well-Known Member

    People that argue that pcs and stuff weren't powerfull enough, etc. jave two problems:

    -Believing that something that can be done today with cutting edge technology couldn't be done with technology from that time(that was cutting edge also).
    -Doesn't have a minimum idea of what clusters are. The need of of powerful machines is what led the creation of the first cluster pc: The Beowulf(correct me if I'm wrong.)
     
  12. Arcwolf09

    Arcwolf09 Guest

    they still need to discover the other sub atomic particles before they can make an equation of everything (ie, a graviton). and negetive energy is real. AI might come to the conclussion that they need to destroy us or subjagate us to protect us.
     
  13. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    :p
    AI right now is just software that is in a shell. They can't really do shit to us physically.
     
  14. Arcwolf09

    Arcwolf09 Guest

    well not now but they are developing a quantum computer than will be more powerful than every computer in the world combined and it is the size of a sugar cube.
     
  15. MR4Y

    MR4Y Well-Known Member

    Actually, most people are falling into cloud computing, where you have a powerfull pc that share it's resourses with less powerfull pcs that are connected to it via internet. Netbooks, smartbooks and web versions of apps(like Office) is what we're going to nowdays.
     
  16. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    Cloud computing has advantages but only a limited number of practical applications.
     
  17. Xynche

    Xynche Well-Known Member

    I still don't agree with the whole 1=2 and nothing is what it actually is type thing when quantum physics is in play.
     
  18. MR4Y

    MR4Y Well-Known Member

    That's right.
     
  19. BloodVayne

    BloodVayne Well-Known Member

    is it completely clear enough that the moon landing was REAL?
     
  20. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    I know, but people still don't understand. :p