So I just spent about 8 hours or so yesterday not being able to play Starcraft II because Battle.net was down, clearly Blizzard is just a totally awesome company. Gameplay wise I'm a much bigger fan of Supreme Commander 2 than Starcraft II. It feels like going back in time with the interface, for example if I want to build multiple supply depots or bunkers I have to hold shift and click multiple times, I can just click and hold to create a line of them. Also if I select a group of military units and there is a SCV amongst them repairing then that gets selected as well and I have to carefully unselect it from a group of unit pictures which is honestly not always easy to see the difference between. In Supreme Commander it will automatically only select the military units. I don't know where this "highly polished" comes from, clearly the testers have been too busy gushing over playing a brand they love to actually see what's right in front of them.
I prefer Company of Heroes over Starcraft 2 over Supreme Commander 2. So it all come down to preference.
Company of Heroes is extremely well done as well, so that I can understand, I enjoyed that game thoroughly.
Yes me too. A match in CoH where I came back for a victory is my greatest video game achievement. That game really allows a player with good backup to get back when he is dominated in early game. Sc2 as amazing as it is, is not designed around the concept. A better player will truly brutalized a lesser even if the lesser player has a better strategy and what not.
How the hell does it hurt the metascore of a game with 90-95? you idiot, maybe if it was 60. Ratings mean nothing.
lol no more bitching i guess ppl really can change well that was interesting to read for a while gets u steamed up thanks for the laughs
Opinion is opinion. Stop acting like my father and stay away from reading review scores, it'll only shorten your lifespan/enjoyment factor.
You remind me of him. Rasnting about something that makes sense if you look at it from another point of view.