1. This forum is in read-only mode.

Stupid sites.

Discussion in 'Gaming Lounge' started by allkratos, Aug 3, 2010.

  1. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    Not anymore. I agree with you guys. Its all opinion.
     
  2. Yutrzenika

    Yutrzenika Well-Known Member

    Now that's better. :p
     
  3. Seph

    Seph Administrator Staff Member

    So I just spent about 8 hours or so yesterday not being able to play Starcraft II because Battle.net was down, clearly Blizzard is just a totally awesome company.

    Gameplay wise I'm a much bigger fan of Supreme Commander 2 than Starcraft II. It feels like going back in time with the interface, for example if I want to build multiple supply depots or bunkers I have to hold shift and click multiple times, I can just click and hold to create a line of them. Also if I select a group of military units and there is a SCV amongst them repairing then that gets selected as well and I have to carefully unselect it from a group of unit pictures which is honestly not always easy to see the difference between. In Supreme Commander it will automatically only select the military units.

    I don't know where this "highly polished" comes from, clearly the testers have been too busy gushing over playing a brand they love to actually see what's right in front of them.
     
  4. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    I prefer Company of Heroes over Starcraft 2 over Supreme Commander 2. So it all come down to preference.
     
  5. unqiueninja

    unqiueninja Well-Known Member

    Now then you know >:D
     
  6. Seph

    Seph Administrator Staff Member

    Company of Heroes is extremely well done as well, so that I can understand, I enjoyed that game thoroughly.
     
  7. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    Yes me too. A match in CoH where I came back for a victory is my greatest video game achievement.
    That game really allows a player with good backup to get back when he is dominated in early game.
    Sc2 as amazing as it is, is not designed around the concept. A better player will truly brutalized a lesser even if the lesser player has a better strategy and what not.
     
  8. seriaku

    seriaku Well-Known Member

    How the hell does it hurt the metascore of a game with 90-95? you idiot, maybe if it was 60. Ratings mean nothing.
     
  9. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    This does not surprise me in the least.
     
  10. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    Bnet will be down occasionally. The same case with WoW
     
  11. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    Its down far more than 'occasionally'.
     
  12. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    Who is to blame? Mike Morhaime? Rob Pardo? or Bobby Kotick? Choose.
     
  13. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    activision/vivendi senior management.
     
  14. vietknightx

    vietknightx Well-Known Member

    lol no more bitching i guess ppl really can change well that was interesting to read for a while gets u steamed up thanks for the laughs
     
  15. mds64

    mds64 Well-Known Member

    Opinion is opinion.

    Stop acting like my father and stay away from reading review scores, it'll only shorten your lifespan/enjoyment factor.
     
  16. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    How does your father has anything to do with it?
     
  17. mds64

    mds64 Well-Known Member

    You remind me of him.

    Rasnting about something that makes sense if you look at it from another point of view.
     
  18. seriaku

    seriaku Well-Known Member

    Super mario galaxy 2 got the meta score of 97, because it DAMN well deserves it.
     
  19. allkratos

    allkratos Well-Known Member

    It's a console Wii game. The standard for is different for the PC and the 360, PS3.
     
  20. msg2009

    msg2009 Romulations sexiest member

    So are you saying games should only be compared to games on the same system?