1. This forum is in read-only mode.

most expensive pc EVER

Discussion in 'Computers & Modding' started by deneel, Sep 10, 2010.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Born2killx

    Born2killx Well-Known Member

    Re: most expansive pc EVER

    There's no such thing as a "power watt". The watt is a unit of power.

    There are different types of RAID configurations. RAID 0 is the "bad" RAID.

    No computer is top of the line for five years without upgrades. Period.
     
    Born2killx, Sep 21, 2010
    #21
  2. phscarface

    phscarface Well-Known Member

    Re: most expansive pc EVER

    Sorry about power watt, I tried to geet a closer word to translate in English, so let's just say the consumption (I dunno if it's the right word) of the GTX 480 is much bigger than ATI Radeon HD 5970, and if the excuse is CUDA, OpenGL and PhysX, you can cross ATI and Nvidia in Windows 7 it's easy, you dedicate the Nvidia's GPU only to process physX and let the graphics to ATI.
    About the RAID I apologise, I must've missunderstand and forgot...
    And I forgot to mention, geez bad choice of his about the OS, coulda have got Windows 7 Ultimate x64.
    Oh geez I typed wrong, I mean 2 years, but I must've hit 5 instead.
     
    phscarface, Sep 22, 2010
    #22
  3. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    Re: most expansive pc EVER

    There is absolutely no need to get windows 7 ultimate. Professional will do everything most users need for less money. Also CUDA is not an 'excuse' for more power consumptiion, its a programming interface to a lot of extremely powerful processing units. The power consumption is entirely justified by the capabilities of the chips.
     
    Loonylion, Sep 22, 2010
    #23
  4. Stanley Richards

    Stanley Richards Well-Known Member

    Re: most expansive pc EVER

    Oh by the way. You mean most EXPENSIVE, because EXPANSIVE is an entirely different word
     
    Stanley Richards, Sep 22, 2010
    #24
  5. deneel

    deneel Well-Known Member

    Re: most expansive pc EVER

    really 0_0?
    [​IMG]
     
    deneel, Sep 22, 2010
    #25
  6. phscarface

    phscarface Well-Known Member

    I didn't told that CUDA is responsable fot the more comsumption, I said that if the user is worried to use the ATI cuz it doesn't have Cuda, OpenGL and PhysX, just do a cross with a 9800GT, GT220 or GT240, then you get benefits of both trademarks.
    Who says that you need to pay for windows 7 ultimate?
    I activated more than 30 PCs for customers with it and they go on microsoft's site to validade and they think it's original.


    Got it?
    Ok again, if the user go with the excuse to not use an ATI Radeon HD 5970 cuz there's not CUDA, OpenGL or PhysX, just do the cross.

    In Windows 7 it's completelly easy to do.
     
    phscarface, Sep 22, 2010
    #26
Page 2 of 2