deadrising 2

well time for me to say something.

now i play left for dead 1 and 2. what i hate about them is there is no story to them. if i had to choose one game and the other one would get destroy. deadrising is a win. for me left 4 dead is the same boring thing. dont get me wrong deadrising is the same too. but i find it more fun to kill zombies that act like zombies. i mean who has ever herd of a zombie moveing as fast a person can. all so l4d even tho it was made from a good company was not that good

 

I never played left 4 dead, but the variety is a nice decent mix, I do admit the typical zombies will get dull at some point...the point of dead rising is what the older resident evil games used to do, AVOID the zombies (though killing them brings more options).


Even though both have zombies, they are completly different, and can't be compared next to each other...why dr2 is closer to gran theft auto in reality.

 

No zombie games can be compared to GTA. The games are absolutely nothing alike, regardless of which zombie game you are talking about.

 

28 days later and 28 weeks later. Awesome zombie films.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Days_Later
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Weeks_Later

I love all things zombie, when I first saw dead rising I just HAD to get it, that old zombie film in the shopping mall is my favourite ever zombie movie.

 

I hope you're not referring to my comments -_-

 

Those ones are more like humans gone ferral.

Pfft, think of it this way, your in a mall, you can do what you like (like gta, in a city), you can go around beating people up or do fetch quest with an optional story.

See where I'm going?

Same concept, swap people with zombies.

Explain the differances, please, honestly I'm reminded of my time in san andreas here.

 

You cant attach a lawn mower blade & motor to a giant lego head & ram people with it in GTA
Post Merge: [time]1286319898[/time]

"Tell me why can't games be in PC?"

I mean the arcade ones.

>The point i am trying to make is that they don't belong on the PC. The pc should be used for more in depth and quality games that have lots of variety in them.
> although there is nothing wrong with a little arcade style games here & there, like the classics. But companies the release arcade games with nice visuals always get me excited, but when i play them I almost instantly get bored because i am already repeating what i have done. It's a waste of time developing arcade style games for PC.

"Did you forget where they're made from?"

Both history and development.

> well i know that to develop games, they have to be made on the pc...
> & as for history...i never really looked into that, i know a little bit about it tho.


"Do you think a console build games from all the sudden? Please dude..."

This I mean like, huh...like if a console has the technology to build a game, better yet, develop the Engine to work in a determinated game.

> i still dont 100% understand what youre trying to say, so lets skip that lol

"So even with this you said that back there?"

I mean that even you saying those things about PC, you still say that arcades can't be played in PC, not that they can't literary, but in a manner od speaking, like if they're not good in PC.

>They just shouldn't bother. The PC is a powerful machine unlike consoles that get outdated very easily by the PC. PC's should be used for more in depth games that have allot of variety in them & not repetitiveness.
> i think i repeated my point 3 times now lol.


Again, I apologize if I sounded too much idiot and troll.

>meh, its ok

 

Of course not, this game CANNOT be a gta clone, it has it's own clicks, but the basic gameplay is close to what gta gives, freedom of choise and fetch quest in a free roaming overworld.

The combo weapons are new to this game, I played the first (though the wii port differs greatly) and only combo weapons are new.


As to your reply to CHris thare, pc games are just like any other games, the only differance is the pc controls of keyboard and mouse can give a better degree of accuracy to those used to them, over players of consoles who will lack such refinement.

The quality of games differes on publishers and developers, games that don't make it to console but pc would have many reasons why not, though as I see it, they just won't sell on consoles because hardly any of us would of heard of the game ad thus it'd be bombed.

 

I ordered it. idk if it sucks yet or not but my friend from canada says its awesome.

 

Nice move, if you have seen walkthroughs in youtube, like I did, you'll know if you like, I guess...
I'm at 15,1% of download at Utorrent.

 

LOL i only torrent movies and sometimes games that dont really have online capabilities.

 

I'm downloading, but if I see that worth a online math and I find the original, sure I'll buy.
The pirated is like a "test drive" hehehehehehehe

 

lol i can never get online cracks to work for any of my torrented games. Though im not very programmy computer person.

 

I got one for RE5, if you got original KEY, you can play online without Disk.
But only if you got the key.

 

could make this website stop sending me security checks to see if im human or not.

 

Well just to let you know, i was joking around when i replied to your comment about GTA, there was no need to go in depth -_- lol
I understood what you ment the first time lol

Online cracks are very rare for games, but the other alternative is Hamachi, it doesnt always work but its also another method.
Or Gerena.

 

The story is the opposite of "optional." You are limited in nearly every sense of the word. I don't accept "you can always start over" as a way around this over. Starting over shouldn't even be something that you HAVE to so to get maximum enjoyment.

GTA's story is far more open, diverse, and provides a much more open area to play in. The people respond far more differently then zombies (ie: they aren't all trying to kill you), the weapons and the way they are used/carried are far different, and overall, the environment is so astoundingly different that you can't even begin to compare.

They are of different genres and have very few concepts very loosely in common. It has no more links with GTA than the Spiderman games for the DS (which may actually have more in common).

 

He was just loosely using an example from GTA. In other words he was only referring to a similar aspect.

 

He may have been referring to a similar aspect, but that doesn't change the fact that a comparison was made. He then chose to elaborate on the point and opened up the possibility for me to explain the differences.

Thus, I did.

 

i dont think so. i was more talking about they guy who was talking about l4d. lol