1. This forum is in read-only mode.

Are furries comparable to paedophiles?

Discussion in 'Debates' started by Conrannex, Mar 5, 2011.

?

Are furries comparable to paedophiles?

  1. Yes.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Not sure.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. athemoe

    athemoe Well-Known Member

    it's just gross :/
     
  2. miniafroboy

    miniafroboy Well-Known Member

    It's bad. NONO.
     
  3. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Not anymore :(
     
  4. athemoe

    athemoe Well-Known Member

    he bought himself a dog *wink*
     
  5. Devon

    Devon Well-Known Member

    What?
     
  6. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Oh u
     
  7. msg2009

    msg2009 Romulations sexiest member

    Why the fuck would you even watch it? Sick bastard.
     
  8. calvin_0

    calvin_0 Well-Known Member

    the same reason i think dragon rape is interesting. curiosity.

    warning alone wont do any good.

    my purpose is for people like you to hate, remember?

    come and arrest me then. i'm in malaysia.

    i dont see it any differ, you see lolicon as sick fetish, i see bdsm as sick fetish.

    unless you are joking, then i'm sorry.
     
  9. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Sorry fucknuts, there's a significant difference between coercing underage kids into sexual activity and two consenting adults engaging in a perfectly safe, legal sexual activity. No matter how you want to spin it, you're in the wrong. I won't get arrested for what I do with my girlfriend/fuck buddy.
     
  10. calvin_0

    calvin_0 Well-Known Member

    to me its the same thing, even its legal, to me its still as sick.

    plus i'm not in jail nor have a history of being arrested for child molestation.

    edit: i would like to add that, i never say that its o.k to molest children.
     
  11. version3

    version3 Is actually KappaMikey in the internet

    It all boils down to this, you're comparing a perfectly legal, yet not really accepted, form of fetish, to a morally wrong, very illegal sexual deviancy. I still can't see how you weigh these two equally.

    Furry = Sick and wrong, but safe in practice, and you don't get v&. Laughed by many, yet acceptable by some.
    Pedophilia = Sick and very wrong, unsafe for the child, not acceptable in ANY circles, will get you hard time and will destroy your life. Not to mention a chance to get on NBC's Dateline for some props.
     
  12. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    No, they are not comparable, and the first post makes a fallacy of assuming that all furries are into the sexual aspects of it, when actually only a minority are. Even within that minority, most have the restraint to refrain from attempting sexual interactions with real animals, and also in many cases would not approve of 'live' porn of such, because it is harmful to the animal, and the vast majority of furries find animal cruelty/abuse abhorrent. I know a number of furries and have done for years, none of them would even consider for an instant having sexual intercourse with an animal.

    As a furry myself, beastaility is not something I approve of, and the last person to accuse me of such to my face got his head kicked in. furries have a very strong (usually non-sexual) love of animals, and the vast majority of them would never do anything to cause harm or distress to an animal. Furries are the kind of people that would intervene if they saw an animal being abused, and very often they volunteer at animal sanctuaries. They work hard to develop a trusting relationship with animals based on mutual respect, and are extremely careful not to betray that trust. Some furries I know are able to walk among even the biggest and strongest predators, such as tigers and lions, without harm, because they have developed their relationship with those animals to the extent that the animals will tolerate their presence at close quarters, and in some cases even welcome them.

    I know one person who was actually invited by a tiger into their enclosure to witness her giving birth. The birth went wrong (a breach birth) and the person was forced to intervene to save the cub's life, and perhaps also the mother's. The mother was completely unsedated and but trusted that human sufficiently for him to be able to intervene and ensure that her cub was born alive. The human mused later that perhaps the mother knew something was wrong and wanted a human present for that reason.

    paedophiles, as defined by law, are sexual predators with a disregard for the welfare of their victims. They couldnt be more different.
     
  13. Devon

    Devon Well-Known Member

    This isn't belittling you in any way, but how do you become curious with child porn?

    How did you even get child porn? I'd wager you'd have to go pretty deep into the internet. I don't think you'd stumble upon it.

    You'd have to actively search for it, and with stuff like this that has happened in the past I'd rather stick to the forced Japanese Idol lesbian porn I get my kicks with. Wow.
     
  14. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    This is generally the view the (certainly UK) courts take. You don't just find child porn, you have to be actively looking for it, therefore if you're caught you're automatically for the high jump. However, there is, unfortunately, a bit too much of a reaction to potential paedophillia. Recently (in the last couple of years) a guy was a victim of ID theft (his details were stolen during a security breach at a well known online retailer) and his credit card was used to buy child porn before he realised his information had been compromised. Of course, the police investigation revealed that he was innocent of all wrongdoing, but it was too late. He had already lost his job, many of his friends and had been forced to move house due to death threats. That kind of damage cannot be easily repaired, if it even can be. Being found innocent in a police investigation or court of law does not remove the stigma of the allegations nor the presumption of guilt on the part of other people.
     
  15. version3

    version3 Is actually KappaMikey in the internet

    So LoonyLion pretty much convinced me that being a furry != dressing up as animals and engaging in sexual acts. But my point still stands on Pedophilia.
     
  16. darkrequiem

    darkrequiem Well-Known Member

    You, sir, creep me out. And that's generally not easy to do.
     
  17. calvin_0

    calvin_0 Well-Known Member

    i found it years back then when the internet is still new (i think around 90s, when yahoo is the best search engine and everyone is using hotmail instead of gmail), i have no idea what child porn really mean, so i search for it.

    my pleasure.
     
  18. darkrequiem

    darkrequiem Well-Known Member

    How did you not know?....
    It's two very well recognized words strung together that implies something quite obvious.
     
  19. calvin_0

    calvin_0 Well-Known Member

    call me a moron or an idiot, but the literal meaning never come into my mind.
     
  20. Devon

    Devon Well-Known Member

    I can believe this, I've met some *coughjanmancough* in my time.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.