1. This forum is in read-only mode.

Are furries comparable to paedophiles?

Discussion in 'Debates' started by Conrannex, Mar 5, 2011.


Are furries comparable to paedophiles?

  1. Yes.

    0 vote(s)
  2. No.

    0 vote(s)
  3. Not sure.

    0 vote(s)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Conrannex

    Conrannex Guest

    >Inb4 shitstorm

    Try to talk about this like an adult instad of trolling or raging, please.

    Here's my argument:

    Furries are extremely comparable to paedophiles, especially with their sexual deviancy and focus.

    Furries are the same as paedophiles.
    Paedophiles have a fetish for young children.
    Furries have a fetish for animals.

    Furries argue that animals can consent and enjoy sex with humans.
    Paedophiles argue that 10 to 13 year olds can consent and enjoy sex with adults.

    Both paedophilia and bestiality are illegal.

    Some furries just look at furry 'hentai'.
    Some paedophiles just look at 'lolicon'/'shotacon'.

    Some furries claim they don't want to have sex with animals and that they just really like/love them.
    Some paedophiles claim they don't want to have sex with kids and that they just really like/love them.

    If you were a paedophile would you go around wearing kid stuff or dressing up as characters from young children tv shows whilst acting childish?

    Even if furries aren't just like paedophiles, should they really be exposing their fetish and 'lifestyle' to young people?
  2. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Furries digust me and their tendency to claim persecution makes me rage all the more. I really do believe the world would be much better off without those individuals.
  3. Natewlie

    Natewlie A bag of tricks

    I was under the impression furries wanted to have sex with anthropomorphic animals, not actual animals.
  4. Conrannex

    Conrannex Guest

    They want to do both. You'd be surprised. Who do you think watches all those horse and dog porn videos? Perfectly healthy individuals? Nope, just daring furries. A lot of furries are too scared to look at that stuff but some aren't. Not to mention a lot of them are in denial.

    Just like a lot of paedophiles look at lolicon and shotacon. They're paedophiles in denial or they just aren't daring enough to look for the real stuff.
  5. markswan

    markswan Well-Known Member

    Until about six months ago, I had no idea that being a "furry" was an inherently sexual thing; I just thought that it was just a hobby where people dress up as animals and go to parties and stuff @_+
    I found out after I happened across some pictures of a cute girl dressed as a bunny wearing a butt plug whilst trawling one of the 4chan boards and tried to find moar. From reading your post, you're saying that bestiality is also normal for a "furry"? Some quick research tells me not; the general Web consensus on the definition of a "furry" (for what that's worth to you) is that they are people that have a fetish for anthropomorphic animals.
    Equating them with paedophiles is ridiculous IMO; so long as they are consenting adults in a fit mental-state to make decisions and they don't harm anyone or force them to do anything against their will, they have as much right to indulge in their fetishes as anyone else has in any other sexual act that follows the necessary rules (of consent etc).
    What do you mean by "exposing" and "young people"? If you mean exposing their genitals to children; then no, of course they shouldn't. If you're taking about yourself, a young person who doesn't want to see "furry" things; stop looking. If you're old enough to take part in a debate on the Internet, you are old enough to take a degree of responsibility in the things that you expose yourself to online.

    How is it that you think that you've come to have such a deep knowledge of the furry community? Do you have any evidence to back up these claims at all?
  6. Littlekill

    Littlekill Well-Known Member

    Want to hear something even more disturbing?

    Furries -> Pedophiles -> Priests -> Pope -> Religion -> Christianity -> Jesus -> Jews -> 9/11

    Furries caused 9/11
  7. markswan

    markswan Well-Known Member

    There isn't enough material in the thread for good trolling yet. I'm disappointed at your poor effort. Make something good out of what's here at the moment and I'll be impressed.
  8. Littlekill

    Littlekill Well-Known Member

    uh... UHHH... UHHHHHHHHH

    i enjoy animal looking humans in sexual situations
  9. doughboy

    doughboy Guest

    And people say I'm a pervert, and always mention pedophilia :I
    Furries he'....
    Well I would say that they are similar in that they are both weird, but they seem to have no other connection besides that....
  10. version3

    version3 Is actually KappaMikey in the internet

    Furries are much better than Pedophiles, imo.

    While being a furry might be a little daunting, people only see it as being a weird fetish, and being one doesn't equate into being an outcast or something similar. If you're a furry? Hey, it's all good, doesn't mean I'd want to be one, but I respect your decision in life. It's like being homosexual/goth/Scientologist/whatever.

    But being a Pedophile utterly destroys any credibility one might have before being exposed as one. Any good deeds and notable works you might have? All that is gone once they found out you were fondling an 11 year old girl (or boy) behind some bushes in an old house somewhere. If you're a pedophile? Get the hell out of my sight before I bring back axe murdering.
  11. markswan

    markswan Well-Known Member

    Whatever, I feel generous.
    Have some kudos for being wonderful :)
  12. doughboy

    doughboy Guest

    wow, i didn't know porn was allowed on romu :I
    this is what im talking about mods -_-
  13. Littlekill

    Littlekill Well-Known Member

    i mean, i enjoy human looking animals in sexual situations
  14. markswan

    markswan Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't call them "porn". Meh, removed anyway so as not to offend teenagers that can't handle barely-dressed women dressed as cats.
  15. doughboy

    doughboy Guest

    I meant 'mods' because I do something like that, and I get banned....others do it, and nothing >:I
    I can handle naked women if you are aiming that comment at me...
  16. calvin_0

    calvin_0 Well-Known Member

    well I have been call both over the internet, i do enjoy furry and lolicon hentai, but i dont actually do them myself. i mean for animal, are you going to risk getting your you know what biten off? even they dont bite them off, there is no way you can fit it into them. plus real animal arent humanoid so they arent very attractive.

    Catgirl is hot, real cat isnt.
    Lola bunny is hot, real rabbit isnt.

    same apply to real children, there is no way it could fit unless you want to hurt them and for a real pedophilia (pedophilia mean children lover in greek not sick adult who molest children) hurting them is the last thing they want.
    also even i'm been call a pedophilia, i dont find Child Porn fun to watch, i actually find it pretty horrible (ya, i watched some of them, someone call the FBI and chris hansen)

    anyway, back to the question, i would say yes, as they are both fetish not that differ from BDSM and other fetish people have.
  17. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    You sick son of a bitch.

    You're sick and belong in jail.

    As a practioner of some facets of BDSM I must point out there is a HUGE difference between tying my girlfriend to the bed and spanking her raw before fucking her senseless, and kiddy fiddling. The fact that you equate the two as similar basically makes any argument you have invalid.
  18. Littlekill

    Littlekill Well-Known Member

    Comparing those two things... its quite insane really

    Kinda feels like calvin should be warning his neighbors that he lives in their neighborhood.
  19. version3

    version3 Is actually KappaMikey in the internet

    Do you even HAVE a girlfriend, Suis? :3
  20. tehuber1337

    tehuber1337 Well-Known Member

    I was unaware calvin still had any credibility here anyway.

    Also, kids are animals so there's no difference. YOU SICK FREAKS
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.