Hey, you guys should check out some of the new alienware comps coming out, I read somewhere that they're working on making one with 4TB hard disk space.
Personally I'm not keen on alienware, they are known to have overheating related problems. Besides, I just like building my own machines Speaking of which, I have some hard disk upgrades on order
You know whats pretty strange, I do tons of stuff on my computer for about 6 hours Every day, And I have Never run out of memory on my 20gb HD. But, I could really use an upgrade (im still on win2k :-[ )
don't bother upgrading, you aren't missing anything. Win 2k with SP4 is virtually XP in terms of features, and its faster.
Just an update I got the car instead of the NAS It's a cool car though, and I still have about a grand left so I might get a NAS sometime in the near future.
Here's my hardrive : Total capacity 25.8GB Remaining 3.38GB.... My computer is very old... It's a wonder I can run N64 games... 50% of the space I'm using is roms/isos..
the terrabyte is highly misleading, technically you get 930 gigabytes. that's why they're releasing a new industry standard called the "tebibyte", which is equal to exactly 1000 gigabytes. http://www.trustedreviews.com/storage/news/2007/12/07/Tebibyte-Mooted-To-End-Capacity-Confusion/p1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tebibyte sorry if this's already been posted, but i couldn't be bothered to trawl through 4 pages
thats stupid, they don't need a new standard; they just need to force manufacturers to adhere to the existing one. A terrabyte is NOT 1000GB, it is 1024GB.
They are wrong. Computers work in base 2 not base ten. While 'terra' in decimal means 1 trillion, in computer terms it means the nearest power of 2. Hence a Kilobyte is actually 1024 bytes, even though 'kilo' means 1,000 in base 10. Computer RAM capacity also increases in powers of 2. A contributing factor to why hard disks actually hold less than their stated capacity is because manufacturers dishonestly use the base 10 definition of the prefix (mega, giga etc), not the base 2 definition that the computer uses. Hence the usable capacity is less than the manufacturer stated capacity.
I'll believe you since I didn't understand half the words you said in that post. And I believe "tera" has one R. It redirects me to terabyte when I search "terrabyte" on Wikipedia.
1,024 KB = 1 MB 1,024 MB = 1 GB 1,024 GB = 1 TB 1,024 TB = 1 YB I heard it was a Yatabyte for the last one but, I dont have time to do research. I'm working. I'm already spending too much time here
Whoa, no way, Warren. A yottabyte is seriously overkill. It's 1,024 zettabytes, which is 1,024 exabytes, which is 1,024 petabytes, which is 1,024 terabytes.
it doesn't really matter what it is as we won't be around to actually see or name it correctly. it will be like the next 1-2 hundred years before something like that may even exists. the problem with current computers today is maintainning heat and size, though there may be more then meets the eye.
All the math is killing me... 128, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096... blah blah blah I have a 1.5 TB hardD and 2.5 GB of RAM (x2) to run any game I ever want to play and any software I ever want to run... until next month when some new freak-computer releases...