Pedophiles Guide to Love and Pleasure: Should This Guy be Censored?

http://www.amazon.com/Pedophiles-Guide-Love-Pleasure-ebook/dp/B0049U4CF6/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top


LOOOOAAAAADDDDDDSSSSS of PC Rage over this kimble ebook. What are your thoughts on this, if any?

Oh and it's pretty much a farm for hate, so 5 star it to cultivate rage, if you want.

 

I see nothing wrong with this book.

 

The book doesn't seem that bad. Hell, I daresay the comments are more offensive than it is easily.

 

It just seems as if it's a guide for pedos to follow and not get into too much deep shit.

They can't help it if they love children can they?

 

*holds out hand* any of u kiddies want some candy?

 

It appears to have been removed...
*Damn* I was too late..

[me=dedboy] returns to shadows [/me]

 

Amazon's delisted it. Nothing to see here. Move along.

 

Talking of Paedos-A man here was up in court for grooming a young girl on the net.He sent her indecent images of himself,and got her to do the same,and was trying to meet up with her.His computer had loads of images on it.

He walked free from court because the procurator fiscal didnt sign some paper or other.

 

404-Document Not Found....

 

link has been removed...

Now I can't see what the fuss was all about :/

 

same here.

 

*Sigh*

It's "Cartman Joins NAMBLA" all over again

 

What, are we against basic human rights of expression suddenly? Give the guy a medal for all I care.

 

Quoting Kyle & Stan from South Park - Cartman Joins NAMBLA Episode:

Kyle: "Dude! You make love with children"

Stan: Yeah, we believe in equal rights & all that, but DUDE! You make love with children so fuck off

As such, if you really want to pursue the right for Free speech & expression you also have to have the balls to take the responsibility for the implications of whatever it is you want to express both good & bad.

 

Uh, I disagree with your last statement. The only implications present with opinions that challenge the status quo are morals. And people shouldn't enforce their morals upon others, everyone should merely draw their own opinions and respect those of others.

Fuck the system.

 

OK, so you find that the guy, drooling, fantasizing & ultimately wanting to fuck with a child is socially acceptible?

Your confusing morals or a set of personal beliefs with social norms pal.

And the fact that Amazon took down the "support" for the God damn book is proof that what the guy wrote about is socially & in a way, morally un-acceptible.

"Fuck the system you say?

More like "Fuck sick weirdos" man.

 

Think of this book as a guide/bible to pedo-ness. Without it, those pedos will go else where (as in the Internet) and do things that are far worse than just following that book.

 

The amount of contradictions here are just wild. You interpret my definition of morals as meaning societal norms, then tear it down based on the argument that the two entities you created in your head contrast each other. Just to top it off, you prove BOTH my INITIAL point and PREVIOUS POINT true by pointing out Amazon only removed the book on a moral basis, disagreeing with the already contradicting body of the first half of your post.

Sweet jesus.

 

I tore down your mother's panties.