1. This forum is in read-only mode.

Luvdisc has a new evolution!!!

Discussion in 'Nintendo' started by totallydood, Jul 22, 2010.

  1. totallydood

    totallydood Guest

    I am not sure if this is the right board but look

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiciuohDxYM

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Batman168

    Batman168 Well-Known Member

    It's still going to suck, just as bad as luvdisc
     
  3. ace1o1

    ace1o1 Well-Known Member

    Much agreed.
     
  4. rell

    rell Well-Known Member

    Nice, I clicked on this page ready to say SPOILER!!! but thats just childish right?? But yea, I think I'll take a slight peek at it...
     
  5. M.AzaryPika3172

    M.AzaryPika3172 Well-Known Member

    Eh... another new pokemon? But is not released under SEREBII.NET and POCKETMONSTERS.NET website?
     
  6. rell

    rell Well-Known Member

    Hey Ace, do me a big favor, knock me upside me head untill I fall into a coma so I wake up when this game is released next year.
    (edit) very embarrassing typo...
     
  7. triemie

    triemie Well-Known Member

    man Nintendo now is failing with pokemon they really suck now :S
     
  8. Usoppu

    Usoppu Well-Known Member

    To say that at this point really is stupid. Nintendo failing with pokemon? that's news to me.
    btw its 'GAME FREAK'.

    The more I'm seeing from this game the more anticipated I'm getting.

    Triple battles does seem interesting considering the new strategy involved.
    http://www.serebii.net/blackwhite/battle.shtml
    Some of the new pokemon designs are actually pretty good aswell, I was pretty sceptical at first.

    I'm not exclusively referring to you Triemie, But people complaining about this game really need to just STFU.
     
  9. drybones41

    drybones41 Well-Known Member

    Yea

    If anyone looked at the pre released pokemon diamond pokemon pictures before it came out, what did you think of them?
     
  10. mds64

    mds64 Well-Known Member

    The pokemon will always look weird.

    I said this about gold version...it's using the pokemon that's the beautiful part, not looking at the ugly little fuckers.
     
  11. AstroGod

    AstroGod Well-Known Member

    If u really think about it all the pokemon look weird (i even thought diamond was gonna suck) but we all get used to the pokemon so its not that weird
    plus there's only like 20 pokemon revealed and some of them look really cool. It still is too early to say that the pokemon will suck and i think it is stupid when people are like really sure that the pokemon suck even though only a few have been revealed (although the starters designs are pretty bad)
     
  12. Stanley Richards

    Stanley Richards Well-Known Member

    And since their pocket MONSTERS, I don't mind them looking all mutated, their monsters for god's sake. Not models for a fashion show.
     
  13. Cahos Rahne Veloza

    Cahos Rahne Veloza The Fart Awakens

    About that, "technically" a monster refers to a big & scary beast & though there are a few big &/or scary Pokemon most are cutesy little buggers.

    Now with that said I wish they didn't go with the title Pocket Monsters to begin with as it kinda defeats the intended meaning. They should have named it something like Pocket Creatures or Pocket Buddies instead.
     
  14. Stanley Richards

    Stanley Richards Well-Known Member

    That's a lame title in my opinion. It's best to keep with pocket monsters. Since Pocket Buddies sounds like a Barney in a ball thing,.
     
  15. melfice666

    melfice666 Well-Known Member

    people should post this kinda info to allready existing topics that are rather common