Everyone of us is a prositute in a sense.

Prositute is an act of exchanging sexual activities for good and money.

we can also say that prositute is an act of exchanging services for good and money.

so in a sense anyone with a job is a prosititue, because we are exchanging our sevices for good and money. Not to mention the newly graduate hunting for job is pretty much similar to a prositute looking for customer in the street.

what do you think?

 

Correct definition. misspelled word by the way

Question, why or how did you come up with that definition?

 

Alot of people use that definition, well the ones I know.


But not towards jobs in perticular, that is a new one for me.

 

services is something people offer to exchange for good and money. some offer brute force, while other offer mind power.

when come for prositute, they offer sex as services.

 

There you go. You took "Offered Sex for money" and "Offered services for money" As the same thing, obviously they are not the same thing. One is too specific, being a prostitute where in you offer Erotic pleasure or company only, the other being broad where in you offer something that of which requires you to do something to or for your client.

A teacher is not a prostitute. A teacher teaches knowledge for money, not sex.

I am no prostitute.

 

like i say in a sense, i didnt say its the new definition or something similar.

prositute offer sex for money, its the services that they offer. like how teacher offer knowledge for money or construction working offer brute force for money.

 

It's just a connotation.

As much as I hate to say it, I agree to what calvin said.

 

Well, youre making an unnecessary connection between numerous types of jobs. Of all the jobs you could've made use of, you picked a prostitute. Hell, we could all be MASSEUSES in a sense.

It's not conclusive that we are ALL prostitutes IN A SENSE.

 

No we're not. Sexual services may make you a prostitute, but any generic services does not make you one.

 

that isnt the point, i pick prostitue is because what they offer, they offer part of themself for money, in a sense we all offer part of ourself for money, like teaching, you offer your mind in term of knowledge, or construction worker who offer thier strength.

 

Oh so it's the mode and currency of exchange you're bantering at. Okay.

Say I'm a stock market entrepreneur. I exchange stock for money. Where in my field of work did I give a part of myself?

 

i dont know what stock market entrepreneur do. but i would asume you would offer up your mind as well as your body....well mouth really, you do need to know which stock is profitable, to do so you'll need knowledge which is your mind, and you'll also need to find a suitable client and convice them that particular stock is profitable.... which is your body.... well mouth really.

 

There you are again connecting ideas which need not be. That's like making a connection between why Ash never paid back Misty's bike and why Germany had to create a 2nd reich. It's all unnecessary and a bit of a nuisance to some. You could explain to me for a million posts forward how you came up with this theory of yours, but I won't bite it. Your proposition may be valid, but it's not true. No one can tell me that I am in a sense a prostitute because of what I do, for I know for a fact that I am not.

 

well i'm not saying that you are a prostitute by literal mean, i only pointing out that everyone who have a job is doing that a prostitue do for a living, selling ourself.

 

You should not connect the definition of Prostitute to the definition of work, labor or job.
Prostitution is a line of work which offers different services like other jobs do.

I asked you this question: "why or how did you come up with that definition?" because you gave a new definition to the word Prostitute.

With all respect and lack of sarcasm or accusation, who gave you the right to give a new meaning to the word "Prostitute"? Or in what place did you get that meaning?

 

i'm not trying to give it a new defination or whatsoever as mention in my other post. and i know prostitue is a job just like teacher or technician, but that isnt what i'm trying to say.

What i'm trying to say is like prositute we are selling ourself for money.

 

Well, you are saying, that prostitutes sell themselves, and we also sell ourselves, correct? So, on the same line, a prostitute is exactly the same as everyone else, not everyone else is the same as a prostitute.

 

I just lol'd on this topic.

First of all, you've misspelled a lot of Prostitute words. This is how you spell it: "Prostitute"

Secondly,

NO. It doesn't even make any sense. I would call your statement a fallacy.
Let's put it into a simple syllogism:

All stars are in the sky.
Angelina Jolie is a star.
Therefore, Angelina Jolie is in the sky.

And you put it in this way:

Prostitute is an act of exchanging sexual activities for good and money.
Prostitute is an act of exchanging services for good and money.
Therefore, any act of exchanging services for good and money is prostitution.

see? it doesn't even make any sense at all. the argument is invalid. i'm sorry, i don't mean to be rude but please think before you post. this topic isn't even debatable, perhaps this should be locked or be moved to the Forum Games, Jokes & Random Section since i find this pointless.

 

Rofl. <3

 

To Crimson, Thank you.

If you enter Logic classes, you deserve a 1.0.. and that is UST Grade. if you go to La Salle, the 4.0 is for you.