1. This forum is in read-only mode.

BEST AGP GFX CARD? UNDER $200? AUS

Discussion in 'Computers & Modding' started by Halo-101, May 16, 2011.

  1. Halo-101

    Halo-101 Well-Known Member

    What is the best GFX Card for AGP I Have 2.8GHZ Pentium 4 with nvidia geforce 6200 and 1GB Ram and am getting a quick upgrade until i can afford a really good PC atm 2 sticks of 1024MB DDRam,700W PSU,And A GFX Card New one is what i am purchasing but out of these which is best?"

    Gigabyte ATI HD4650 AGP 1GB 128-bit GDDR2, Dual Link DVI-I / D-sub / HDMI / HDCP, Fan
    PowerColor HD3650 1G DDR2 DH AGP
    PowerColor ATI HD4670 1G DDR3 AGP
    PowerColor ATI Radeon HD3650 512M DDR2 DH AGP
    Sapphire HD4650 1G AGP

    Anyhelp greatly Appreciated thnx in advance.
    -Halo101
     
  2. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    a 6800 or 7800GS. It's not worth it, frankly.
     
  3. Halo-101

    Halo-101 Well-Known Member

    HIS IceQ H467QS1GHA Radeon HD 4670 1GB 128-bit DDR3 AGP 4X/8X HDCP Ready Video Card

    This Card Good??

    I was thinking of purchasing either the above or ATI 3650

    With 4 sticks 500MB DDR Ram

    700W PSU

    And i have pentium 4 2.8GHZ
     
  4. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Doesn't matter which is the best or not. They won't handle anything approaching modern loads.

    Also your PSU is wasting a fuckload of power, I'm running an overclocked HD6950 and I can manage to survive on 600W.
     
  5. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    Incorrect. The watt rating is the maximum wattage it is capable of supplying, not the amount it consumes. The amount it consumes is determined by the sum of the power draws of each component. 700W just means he can have approximately 700W worth of components drawing from it before it overloads.
     
  6. Suiseiseki

    Suiseiseki Well-Known Member

    Don't you patronise me. You should however be aware of the efficiency bell curve where the power supply consumes more energy than is necessary for sub-optimal draw (from memory, around 70-85% of PSU wattage). The difference between watts consumed and watts supplied to the computer is dissipated as heat.

    The point I am making is twofold:
    - He's overspent on the PSU
    - The PSU's life expectancy is slightly lower as a result of the lower load
     
  7. Loonylion

    Loonylion Administrator Staff Member

    The efficiency bell curve you mention isn't so significant these days, as most PSUs have high efficiency (often over 80%, some as high as 95%) over quite a wide subset of their supply capacity, and overspend is always better than underspend when talking about PSUs. Given that he's using a P4 which are enormously inefficient he could well be using as much power as your computer does, or more. Assuming he's building his own replacement machine he can reuse the powersupply in his new build because it will power more hungry components than he currently has, especially with a more efficient processor, which anything newer will be. As for reduced life, it will last far longer than any of his computers, shortened or not. I have PSUs that are well over a decade old that are still running just fine.