1. This forum is in read-only mode.

Armored Core: 4 or Answer?

Discussion in 'Microsoft' started by SoulSin, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. SoulSin

    SoulSin Well-Known Member

    Armored Core 4 or Armored Core: For Answer
    which is supposedly better?

    The only thing i found are angry fans/retarded reviews mixed with other Happy-Fan reviews.

    Feeling like player some mech stuff. I heard of AC for some time now, wonder if its a good idea?




    Can always just wait for AC 5.
     
  2. mds64

    mds64 Well-Known Member

    For answer I heard is meant to be an upgraded 4, on the ps3 edition you have the option of sending your save data from 4 to for answer...

    I liked for answer.
     
  3. gameboy5.0

    gameboy5.0 Well-Known Member

    ????? not sure but off topic if you want to play a good war game play ace combat 6 on 360 it fun
     
  4. mds64

    mds64 Well-Known Member

    VERY off topic, you dont even know what ac is!

    It's a mech game dude.
     
  5. SoulSin

    SoulSin Well-Known Member

    Yeh armored core is a mech game :V


    Besides, Ace Combat put me to sleep. I wish they could add some crazy features and ditch the reality a bit.
     
  6. Natewlie

    Natewlie A bag of tricks

    Great way to tell if someone hasn't played Ace Combat.

    Get For Answer.
     
  7. gameboy5.0

    gameboy5.0 Well-Known Member

    lol that true .

    as for the reality to it. i play hawk and hated how the planes fly. ace combat the planes fly like a real plane and when in dog fights it more harder to shoot them down. the game takes skill and a bit of planeing.

    now time to go on topic. the closes game i have play to armor core is war world. i think i did play it on the ps2 but the game was not that good. i would need to play armor core to see if it is the same
     
  8. SoulSin

    SoulSin Well-Known Member

    hahaha sorry for the AC comment
    I played only 0 and 5 (or it was zero? dunno now). Even though I had a lot of fun in the beginning, I never had patience to beat any of then >_>.


    Anyway, I am going for answer them.